An Indestructible Wireless Broadband Network for All – Part 2

[Click here to see part 1 of this 2-part article]

“There are better ways of assuring very high reliability and very high quality of service than selling spectrum,” said Rajeev Krishnamoorthy. He was referring to the idea that allowing radios to self-organize will provide for a more efficient use of spectrum than through existing allocation methods. Devabhaktuni Srikrishna points out that their modeling suggests that this approach to spectrum allocation could double the throughput to existing networks.

Krishnamoorthy and Srikrishna also discuss possible pilots projects.

Click here to see part 1 of the above video interview.

FirstNet Would Make a Good First App

One application that policy makers should look at for this approach to would be the FirstNet network. Equipping each of the approximately 1.5 to 2 million first responders (police officer, paramedics, firefighters and EMTs) in the U.S., with a $500 smart phone (not too unreasonable, considering very capable android phones can be had for less $250)  outfitted as a node in a SocialMesh network would only cost $1 B, as compared to the $7 B that has been allocated and the $10 B that some suggest is necessary for FirstNet. This alone would eliminate the need for auction of broadcast spectrum in order to fund FirstNet.

In  follow up email, Srikrishna reinforced the notion that FirstNet is a natural approach for a SocialMesh approach.

“It would make much more sense for FirstNet to pursue a SocialMesh approach based on frequency-agile smart phones rather than waste decades trying to build and standardize a cellular infrastructure that piggybacks on carrier networks. Public safety and police have been asking for reliable, high-speed P2P/D2D communications for at least a decade, and we (collectively as an industry) have not delivered on that need — why? Right now, public safety agencies are fighting a standards battle to get D2D communications embedded into the future versions of the LTE standards, but since it’s not a priority for carriers, who knows if that will be implemented in commercial smart phone chips even if it makes its way into the LTE standards.”

He goes on to point out that the power of the SocialMesh approach is the crowd.

“The only reason FirstNet needs so many base stations in the first place is that there are not always enough first responders around to relay the packets back to the Internet (1-2 million total in the US) in a time of need. What if hundreds of millions of citizen smart phones that are already roaming around could act like FirstNet base stations? We would need a lot fewer fixed base stations to begin with.”

Long term, I think it makes more sense for the FirstNet vision to expand to include all citizens
  1. They can add many more nodes to the Crowd Cloud than public safety officers or vehicles can alone.
  2. Often times the need during disasters is to enable communication to/from citizens for weeks and months after the initial event. For example this is what happened during Sandy and Katrina.
In this spirit, some people including our former FCC chairman Genakowski have aptly proposed we should include citizen smart phones using the Wi-Fi radio already in the smart phone,
I recommend this well-written article and I fully agree with the thrust and purpose of his proposal. However my only comment is that using 20 dBm smart phone Wi-Fi interfaces for this purpose represents a marginal benefit. This is due to limited range of the Wi-Fi in smartphones (100-200 feet in practice). Speaking from deep experience working with outdoor Wi-Fi, the main reason Tropos routers have 36dBm EIRP and are mounted high up on poles is that it takes a much larger link budget to power through urban jungles.
It is too optimistic to expect that a crowd cloud based on smart phone Wi-Fi will be there for us when public safety first responders or citizens really need it during disasters or crises. As our paper on the Mobile Crowd Cloud shows, to fully leverage the spatial diversity present in the Crowd Cloud and create a usable disaster-proof network for everyone, a more capable radio interface (an LTE-like radio or better) is needed.”
The idea of the everyday citizen helping in emergency communications has precedent, as Amateur Radio operators have been active in creating ad-hoc networks in times of crisis for decades. Using the intelligence of an app-driven smart phone, coupled with digital radio technology, Srikrishna’s Mobile Crowd Cloud proposal allows anyone with a smart phone to be part of the emergency communications’ network.
email Devabhaktuni Srikrishna at [email protected]

[Added 10/14/16 – goTenna’s latest offering (referenced at the bottom of this article) appears to feature the attributes of the social mesh network outlined above and could be an interesting approach for a FirstNet-style network.]

7 responses to “An Indestructible Wireless Broadband Network for All – Part 2”

  1. […] An Indestructible Wireless Broadband Network for All – Part 2 […]

  2. […] Indestructible Wireless Broadband Network for All – Part 1 An Indestructible Wireless Broadband Network for All – Part 2 The Social Electric Network Social Networking – The New […]

  3. […] In part 2 of this two-part interview, we will look at how this crowd sourced approach to communications allocates spectrum without the need for human intervention. […]

  4. Ken Pyle Avatar
    Ken Pyle

    This July 2016 Congressional Research Service report reports that the cost of the FirstNet network has increased to $30B and that doesn’t include the hidden value in the spectrum they plan on monetizing:

    “FirstNet refers to the need to monetize the value of its spectrum holdings to expand coverage, based on the existing commercial footprint for LTE, not the footprint of statewide or local public safety networks. It does not estimate the value to states and communities of small cell networks and the wireless component of community broadband that may be transferred to FirstNet’s commercial partners. FirstNet’s plans appear to capture for its own use most of the value of spectrum used to provide both coverage and capacity. This value is unknown but potentially far greater than what FirstNet can lawfully spend on improving its network or by reducing user fees. The excess value of the spectrum and access to local markets that FirstNet is using to barter for goods and services, therefore, will in most cases go to FirstNet’s contractual partners, not to the states and communities intended by the act to be the primary beneficiaries of FirstNet’s actions. Economists might describe this as a monopoly surplus.” (PDF)

  5. Ken Pyle Avatar
    Ken Pyle

    That so many people and first-responders used Zello, which is still a multi-point-to-point solution, to save lives in Houston is a proof-point that a device-centric, a human-first approach really, works.

  6. […] upon FCC rules regarding spectrum. What goTenna has developed is reminiscent of the work of Krishnamoorthy and Srikrishna and their idea to create a social mesh network that could also be used by first responders. With […]

  7. […] upon FCC rules regarding spectrum. What goTenna has developed is reminiscent of the work of Krishnamoorthy and Srikrishna and their idea to create a social mesh network that could also be used by first responders. With […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.